But there’s dumb and then there’s really dumb. “From left to right, American Jews are criticizing Israeli anti-boycott law”

Backers of a new Israeli law penalizing anyone who targets Israel or West Bank settlements for boycotts tout it as a tool to fight back against anti-Israel campaigns, but American Jewish organizations seem remarkably united in deeming the measure an affront to freedom of expression.

Does Ron understand the difference between American Jews and American Jewish organizations? Or do you have to be a non-member of orgs to get that?

Okay how about from left to right? Ron quotes Morton Klein of ZOA who doesn’t know what the bill means and think it makes boycotts illegal. That is the only person, place or thing on the right that the article quotes. And it’s from someone who doesn’t understand the bill.

Does anyone at the JTA speak English? If you’re going to make the focus of your dumbass article a false claim that American Jews on the left and right oppose the bill, then you have to talk to more than one person on the right. And that person should know what the fracking bill does.

“Not since ‘Who is a Jew?’ ” has there been a controversy that could seriously strain relations between Israel and American Jews, said one pro-Israel heavyweight, referring to the early 1980s battle.

Not since 5 minutes ago has Ron Kampeas used an unsourced anonymous quote to shore up a bullshit claim that no one takes seriously for 5 minutes.

“Not since Ron Kampeas was caught shoplifting women’s panties at K-Mart has there been such a crisis that threatened the future of the JTA this much,” said one influential journalist in a bathroom stall. Does this mean the end of the JTA. Very probably.

JTA House Style, Represent!

Morton Klein, the ZOA’s president, said he was still examining the law, but that in principle the ZOA opposed anti-boycott laws.

“Nobody was more appalled by the boycott of Ariel theater than me, but to make it illegal? I don’t think so,” Klein told JTA, referring to calls by some Israeli artists to boycott a performing arts center in the West Bank settlement of Ariel.

Did Ron Kampeas misrepresent the bill in his phone call to Klein. And if he didn’t, did he happen to tell Klein that it doesn’t make boycotts illegal.

JTA Journalism, Represent!

Joining the ADL in issuing statements condemning the law were an array of dovish Jewish groups that included the New Israel Fund, J Street and Americans for Peace Now.

“When you start to persecute unpopular opinions, there really is no end point,” said Naomi Paiss, a spokeswoman for the New Israel Fund.

Yeah, next thing you know you’re persecuting unpopular countries and boycotting products from companies in them.

Until then. Meet your new President and his fake stache. Thomas L. Friedman!

Maybe it is just my friends, but I find more and more people completely disgusted by this situation and looking for a serious Third Party candidate who could run in 2012

No, no. It’s not just your friends who want you to run for President… because they’re mean people and think it would be really funny. All of America is just like them. Eagerly waiting for the Sage of the Ugly Gray Lady to get off his Vespa and save this country! Now.

The truth is, we need to do four things at once if we have any hope of maintaining American greatness:

Five things if you count hunting for spiders in Friedman’s stache.

We need more stimulus to keep the economy from slipping back into recession. But we need to combine that stimulus with a credible, legislated, long-term plan for cutting spending and getting the deficit under control

My Fellow Americans, we need to spend money like drunken sailors to save the economy and have a credible long term plan to cut spending and get someone up here to bring me my pants. Wait, what’s the third thing?

And we need to raise new revenues in order to reinvest in the sources of our strength: education, infrastructure and government-funded research to push out the boundaries of knowledge.

Those are the sources of our strength? What about plutonium?

The Thomas Friedman plan, raise taxes and spend more money on schools, highways and government funded research to resurrect Carl Sagan as a zombie. Also have a long term plan for cutting spending. It’s like the Obama plan to fix the economy, but with more Sagan zombies.

That’s right. We need to do four things at once: spend, cut, tax and invest.

It takes a truly superior mind to propose a bunch of contradictory things and call it a bold plan.

We need to mow the lawn, set the lawn on fire, make love to the lawn and take good care of the lawn. The Thomas Friedman way!

So what we’re basically saying as a country is that unless the market or Mother Nature make us pay, we are going to hand this whole bill over to our children.

But at least our children will grow up never having to read Thomas Friedman because all their lawns will be on fire as per Friedman’s 2013 Save Our Lawns By Setting Them On Fire initiative.

Maybe it is just my friends, but I find more and more people completely disgusted by this situation and looking for a serious Third Party candidate who could run in 2012 and deliver the shock therapy to the corrupt, encrusted, two-party duopoly now running the show in America.

…while bringing back the porn stache at the same time.

Take that corrupt encrusted duopoly! Here’s some shock and awe courtesy of Friedman’s facial hair.

Such a Third Party would have a simple agenda: 1) Inject a short-term stimulus. 2) Enact Simpson-Bowles. 3) Shrink our presence in Afghanistan. 4) Raise automobile mileage standards. 5) Impose a gasoline tax to pay for a massive increase in government-supported scientific research and a carbon tax to pay for new infrastructure and stimulate clean-power innovation.

So this third party would be the Democratic party and the Obama Administration, but with a snappier mustache.

Hope, Change and Stache

Do I think such a Third Party can win in 2012? Not likely. But it doesn’t have to win to be effective. If such a party attracted substantial voters on such a platform, it would shape the agendas of the Republicans and Democrats.

No it just has to siphon enough votes away from the Republican party by pretending to be a Third Party alternative so that Obama can win.

What do you get when a moron writes an article about Israel? You get ‘Moronics” (Not to be confused with the Church of Moronology)

Sit tight kiddies, Uncle Ira Chernus will hitch up his red diaper and clue you in on the truth about Israel

—-Blah blah Jewishlobbyrunstheworld blah blah blah MoreJewishLobby blah blah blah JewishLobbyStoleMyFaceAndReplacedItWithaDennysPlaceMat blah blah blah—

Israel actually promotes three separate myths of insecurity, although its PR machine weaves them into a single tightly knit fabric. To grasp the reality behind it, the three strands have to be teased apart and examined separately.

I bet Ira is real proud of that sentence. He spent a week knitting that metaphor together only to get the strands of it tangled in his teeth.

Myth Number 1: Israel’s existence is threatened by the ever-present possibility of military attack. In fact, there’s no chance that any of Israel’s neighbors will start a war to wipe out Israel. They know their history. Despite its size, ever since its war of independence in 1948, the Israeli military has been a better equipped, better trained, more effective, and in virtually every case a successful fighting force.

Hear that kids. Israel has had the BEST ARMY SINCE 1948. And it has never been attacked since 1948. NEVER. NOT ONCE.

There’s no chance that Israel’s neighbors will attack it. At all. Just like they didn’t in 1967 or 1978. It’s downright INCONCEIVABLE. Egypt knows its history so well, that it celebrates the Yom Kippur War as a victory. Which means they’ll never do it again. Even when the next leader of Egypt just threatened to go to war against Israel. IT CAN’T HAPPEN.

Isn’t it great when a moron destroys his own argument in the same paragraph he makes it. I bless Israel that all its enemies may be as dumb as Ira Chernus.

While the Israeli government constantly sounds alarms about imagined Iranian nuclear weapons — though its intelligence services now suggest Iran won’t have even one before 2015 at the earliest — Israel remains the region’s only nuclear power for the foreseeable future.

The foreseeable future according to Ira Chernus is 4 years. Sorry 3 and a half.

According to Ira Chernus he will live forever for the foreseeable future. Until he trips over his own shoelaces and falls into a clown’s ass.

To deliver its most powerful weapons, Israel can rely on its 100 land-based missile launchers, 200 aircraft armed with cruise missiles, and (according to “repeated press reports”) cruise-missile-armed submarines. The subs are key, of course, since they ensure that no future blow delivered to Israel would ever lack payback.

Unless the subs are in the strike zone. And since Israel is such a huge country and its territorial waters are so vast…

In sum, none of the nations that Israel casts as a threat to its very existence can pose an existential military danger.

Which is obviously true. Because Egypt, Syria and Iran may outnumber Israel in manpower and resources, and Egypt and Syria have fought several wars against Israel… but they can’t pose an existential military danger because a Professor of Religious Studies as the University of Colorado at Boulder says so. And he must be right. And history must be wrong.

Myth Number 2: The personal safety of every Jewish Israeli is threatened daily by the possibility of violent attack. In fact, according to Israeli government statistics, since the beginning of 2009 only one Israeli civilian (and two non-Israelis) have been killed by politically motivated attacks inside the green line (Israel’s pre-1967 border). Israelis who live inside that line go about their daily lives virtually free from such worry.

Which is because Israel has locked down Gaza, built a separation wall and uses checkpoints. All stuff that Ira Chernus opposes.

This is like the ACLU claiming that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed isn’t really a threat because he’s in Guantanamo Bay. Which he is over their fracking opposition.

Also bus bombing in Jerusalem just last month.

As a result, the insecurity myth has come to focus on rockets — the real ones launched from Gaza and the imaginary ones that supposedly could be launched from a future Palestinian state in the West Bank.

And the ones actually launched from the West Bank.

Those rockets are part of an ongoing war in which each side uses the best weapons it has. The Palestinians, of course, have access to none of the high-tech Israeli guidance systems. Their weaponry tends to be crude and often homemade. They shoot their rockets, most of them unguided, and let them fall where they may (which means the vast majority harm no one).

If Israel used the best weapon it had, Gaza and the West Bank would be smoking craters glowing as brightly as Ira Chernus’s mother’s womb was when he was a baby.

Also this month they used an anti-tank missile on a fracking school bus. Why not use it on a tank? Because tanks shoot back. School buses don’t. But we can’t blame the Martyrs of Frackistan for being cowards. Each side uses the best weapons it has. Israel has courage, Palestinians have a religious phobia brought on by latent homosexual tendencies.

The logic of the myth goes back to the premise of the earliest Zionists: All gentiles are implacably and eternally anti-semitic. By this logic, any attack on one Jew, no matter how random, becomes evidence that all Jews are permanently threatened with extinction.

Adolf Hitler on the phone. Sorry Ira, you can’t just lift entire sections from my book. It’s not cool, man. We’re on the same page here, but you still gotta give it up for the man.

Most Zionists have been unable to see that once they founded a state committed to regional military superiority, they were bound to be on the receiving as well as the giving end of acts of war.

But they were on the receiving end of war… before the state was founded.

The Jewish community of Hebron should have thought through its posture of regional military superiority of reading books and praying, before they were on the receiving end of a Muslim Massacre (TM).

There have always been people who saw the Jewish state, imposed on indigenous Palestinians, as illegitimate.

and by people he means morlocks

Were Israel to start behaving by accepted international moral norms, the BDS movement would fade from the scene quickly enough, ending the crisis of “delegitimization” — just as the rockets from Gaza might well cease.

I’m on the same page as Cousin Ira here.

If Israel starts treating Gaza the way China or Russia or 90 percent of the world would, the rockets would go away and so would the crisis.

But here’s the reality of this moment: The only genuine threat to Israel’s security comes from its own oppressive policies, which are the fuel propelling the BDS movement.

Also antisemitism would go away if Jews just stopped being so darn hateful.

Adolf still doesn’t get the credit he deserves. “If Jews stop picking fights with me, there will be peace. Odderwise final solution.”

But what if the American public knew the facts that Obama acknowledged? What if every solemn reference to Israel’s “security needs” were greeted not with nodding heads, but with the eye-rolling skepticism it deserves? What if Israel’s endless excesses and excuses — its claims that the occupation of the West Bank and the economic strangulation of Gaza are necessary “for the sake of security” — were regularly scoffed at by most Americans?

And what if they made Ira Chernin their king! And built him a throne made out of used bubble gum! And declared Fellatio a national holiday! And replaced President’s Day with Down With Israel Day! And got Noam Chomsky brain transplants!

The crowds are in the streets. They’re chanting. “We love you Ira. We’re going to tear down Tel Aviv in your name. You are our new Jesus”. And then Ira wakes up to soiled sheets and goes to check the comments on his Huffington Post article. “One day,” he thinks, “one day.”

And now Maxwell House is touting its new release of a Haggadah for people who were really worried about gender roles in the Haggadah. Meet the new Maxwell House Tranny Haggadah.

In 5771, the “King” was overthrown.

The King is G-d so yeah… overthrowing Him sounds like a great entry to a religious holiday.

As part of a revolution in both linguistics and religious practice, the Maxwell House Haggadah, a staple of countless Jewish homes on Passover for 80 years, has been given a modern makeover. The new version, which was distributed in stores nationwide last week, drops the familiar phrase “King of the universe” in blessings, in favor of the gender-neutral “Monarch.”

Also missing in the new version of the Haggadah are most male-centered pronouns and possessive words that refer to God, as well as other gender-specific phrases. Think Four Children instead of Four Sons.

The Four Sons come from the Torah. And Hebrew is a gender specific language. I assume that means they changed the text of the translation, not the Hebrew, which figures since anyone who doesn’t understand that the four sons are a metaphor, and not actual sons, probably can’t read Hebrew anyway. Or maybe they changed the Hebrew.

But what about trannies? Is the new Maxwell House Haggadah tranny friendly? What about fat friendly? What’s it carbon footprint?

Why did Maxwell House choose to pander to PC morons like this? Because it’s aiming at what it thinks is a new demographic. Goodbye grandpa, hello inclusive seder that is a metaphor for gay liberation and the historical experience of black slavery.

Except that’s stupid and not just in the obvious ways. Maxwell House went into this to promote the use of its coffee to families who observed Passover by getting rid of their chametz. How many of the PC Klan bother with that? And how many of them are going to treat Maxwell House as some kind of tradition. They’re not, because Passover seders are a wacky tradition that they get in and out of, between Tibetan meditation and progressive vomiting for the rainforest. If they’re going to have coffee, it’s going to be from Whole Foods.

Instead Maxwell House alienates Jews who actually celebrate Passover.

No. The latest Maxwell House Haggadah also has expunged antiquated words like “thee” and “thine,” and added up-to-date graphics and photographs.

Up to date? Exodus pie charts. AP wire photos of the exodus. How do you have up to date photos of an event that happened thousands of years ago?

“It was time — language has evolved. We want people to sit [at the seder table] and have an idea of what they’re saying,” said Elie Rosenfeld, who, as CEO of the Joseph Jacobs advertising agency, coordinated the yearlong production process for the new Haggadah

Then maybe it’s time Maxwell House evolved by firing the Joseph Jacobs advertising agency and replacing it with a Jewish ad agency instead. Or a non-Jewish one that respects Jewish tradition.

“It’s 2011,” said Henry Frisch, a retired high school teacher — he taught a Bible as literature course — who did the translations for the new Haggadah. His goal: a Haggadah “more comfortable for American Jewish families.”

Wow. I’m glad Maxwell House and Jacob Joseph went all out to hire a retired high school teacher to do their translation because he at one point taught a literature course. What was Plan B, pay a homeless bum 50 cents to do it for them? The respect and dedication here are overwhelming to behold.

How about just replacing the Haggadah with Jonathan Livingstone Seagull? That would be much more comfortable for the target demographic that wants gender neutral language.

In an age when flashy graphics and the latest expressions are so instantly available with click of a computer mouse, centuries-old English and male-particular wording were considered outmoded for most Jewish American homes; change was inevitable.

In an age when blah blah blah… a Haggadah isn’t going to be able to compete by going tranny. Watering the Haggdah and its traditions down makes it less competitive.

But all the changes, Frisch says, are faithful to the intent of the Hebrew words. “It’s not non-Orthodox.”

That’s exactly what it is.

“This is not a feminist Haggadah,” Rosenfeld said. “It’s a very much, all-inclusive Haggadah.”

No a feminist Haggadah would celebrate the major role that women played in Jewish life in Egypt and resistance to slavery. That would be a good thing. This is inclusive, which means it’s gibberish.

“The focus on gender-free language has become widespread in America, and is non-controversial,” said Jonathan Sarna, professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University.

Yes it is controversial. If it weren’t, Maxwell House’s PR machine wouldn’t be cranking all this spin out.

There is nothing revolutionary about the revision. The upgraded … Haggadah shows how traditions can be harmonized with contemporary practice without losing their essence.”

Upgraded? Are we talking about a computer here. How do you upgrade an ancient text? By using words like “harmonized” in sentences, when what you actually did was change language you didn’t like in line with your political sensibilities while eroding the meaning of the tradition?

Also obvious was adoption, whenever possible, of language that is not gender-specific, especially when referring to a Deity who is not gender-specific. “Everyone should be comfortable using the Haggadah,” Frisch said.

Except Jews.

Rewriting the Haggadah for inclusivity makes those who don’t share your revisionist agenda uncomfortable.

The new Haggadah cites “the strict Guardian of promises to Israel” instead of “He, who observeth strictly his promise unto Israel.”

Not only isn’t this an improvement, it destroys the poetry of the original and changes its meaning.

A Strict Guardian is not the same thing as one who strictly observes a promise. And you idiots have the nerve to mock the translation in the original.

A phrase in the Hallel (prayers of praise) excerpt from Psalms praises God “Whose glory is above the heavens” instead of a previous rendition, “His glory is above the heavens.”

Who’s glory is it? We don’t know. Could be anyone. Not G-d, that’s for sure. No G-d allowed in the Maxwell House Tranny Haggadah.

The “Braveheart” star apparently tried to goad a police office into drawing his weapon and shoot by hurling anti-Semitic slurs after he was stopped for drink driving.

Apparently we mean that there’s no evidence for this except some friend of Mel’s is claiming this in a lame attempt to make us feel sorry for him. He’s not a bigot, just suicidal!

But a close friend has revealed Gibson wasn’t anti-Jewish but on a mission to die because he felt he had failed after his wife Robyn had left him.

It’s not that hard to die. You just drive in a wall. Or down a bottle of pills. Or drive into a wall after downing a bottle of pills. You don’t need to go on a special mission to do it.

Death by cop is a popular way of suicide in the US where people deliberately provoke police offices into using their weapons.

Yeah, and they do it by pointing a weapon at a cop or in some way threatening him. Ranting about Jews is not ‘Death by Cop’, it’s just a surly drunken bigot being himself.

Soon after he was stopped for drink driving and launched into his now infamous rant against the arresting officer saying “Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world”.

A friend of the actor told Hollywood author Peter Biskind that Gibson was trying to get the officer, James Mee, to draw his weapon and fire

So an anonymous friend of Mel Gibson is making a bullshit excuse for him.

If Gibson wanted the cop to draw his gun and shoot him, all he had to do was charge him. Or try to run him over. Or shove a hand into his pocket and scream, I’VE GOT A GUN.

Cops won’t shoot you if you yell slurs. They will shoot you if you threaten them. If Gibson really wanted to commit suicide by cop, it wouldn’t have been that hard. But he was just being a drunken bigot, not going through a complicated attempt at getting a cop to shoot him.

“Mel was trying to invite death by cop. I don’t think this was being anti-Semitic. I think he was trying to rile that guy into pulling out a gun and shooting him.”

Shouldn’t he have been calling the cop names then? Instead of making general statements about the Jews. How would he even know the cop was Jewish?

And was “sugar tits” his way of getting the female cop to shoot him?

Load of crap. That’s what this is.

According to the friend Gibson had said goodbye to everyone in the restaurant before getting in his car. “I believe what was going on that night was a farewell,” the friend said.

Yeah. Saying goodbye to everyone was clearly Gibson going off to die. Or just what people when they leave. Drunk people anyway.

Follow up question. When Gibson was making anti-semitic remarks to Wynona Ryder, was he trying to commit suicide by Wynona Ryder?

How dare these awful people say there’s anything wrong with Jewish women marrying Muslim men?

Just look at all the reasons why Jewish women should marry Muslim men.

1. Domestic abuse is guaranteed by the Koran. If your husband is a devout Muslim then he will beat you. Because it’s in the Koran.

2. If he ever gets tired of you, polygamy is still legit in Islam. So better get used to sharing Jameel.

3. Don’t have daughters. If you do, first their clitoris will be cut off, and then their head if they ever dishonor the family by acting like teenage girls.

4. All your husband has to do to divorce you is recite a sentence in Arabic three times. He can also email it you or text it to you.

5. If you move to an Arab village and get raped, your rapists can accuse you of adultery. You can’t accuse them of rape.

6. Your mandatory body garment also doubles as a shroud when your husband decides to dispose of you.

7. Your children will grow up taught to murder Jews.

Great list, no? What’s there not to like. Come marry Abdul. No one will see the black eyes under the Niqab. And what do a bunch of stupid racist Rebbetzins know anyway.

Plus Rabbi Nezek Jihadi of the Masroti movement and 49 of his favorite goats have already signed on to a letter encouraging Jewish women to marry Muslim men. It’s great. It’s fun.

Once you marry a Muslim, you’ll never go back. Not unless you manage to sneak away in the middle of the night without being murdered.

Eddie Beckford is an African-American Christian missionary who calls himself a messianic Jew, harasses Jewish residents of Arad and just got convicted of assault. The video can be found all over YouTube under the name, “This is Why People Hate the Jews” uploaded by AradIsrael. The Rosh Pina Project is too dishonest to list its real title. Because Yeze Yezekiel is still pretending to be pro-Israel and not anti-Semitic. And running a video like “This is Why People Hate the Jews” would be a tip off.

But blogs like Harry’s Place still insist on giving space to this cult member to smear Israel and civil rights organizations such as Honenu. Some cult and missionary groups pretend to be pro-Israel as a ploy. But they hate Jews. And when given a chance, they show it.

If they didn’t hate Jews, they wouldn’t constantly seek to impersonate Jews in order to attack their religion. Here’s another reminder of what Edwin Beckford stands for and what cult members like the Rosh Pina Project really support when it comes to the Jews of Israel.

What’s the difference between “Messianic Jews” and “Neo-Nazi thugs” again? The former have prayer requests and file civil rights complaints. That’s what.

No other community would be dragged out this way, scapegoated, demeaned and forced to justify itself to outsiders for something that is not unique to that community. There would be no such roundup of black leaders to denounce themselves for dealing drugs. No roundup of Latinos to denounce themselves for car thefts. Any newspaper that tried to do it would have its ass kicked for even trying it.

Singling out a minority that way is bigotry. And the Village Voice knows it will get away with it. Because some kinds of bigotry are still hip.

The Village Voice won’t do a piece asking how the Ground Zero Mosque’s Imam Rauf can justify being a slumlord. But they will do a roundup of Jew bashing by pathetic weasels like Shmuly Yanklowitz under the pretense of a serious investigation.

Speaking of Shmuly Yanklowitz…

When it came out, we publicized it and tried to create awareness around it. When it came out, we held a beit midrash—a study session—in Washington Heights to raise awareness about the issue.

Shut up weasel, you don’t know what a beit midrash is. When you touch a chumash, it bursts into flames. The only awareness you create is internet trolling to promote your fake organization which exists only to raise money from liberal groups and harass religious Jews.

It’s always been a personal priority of mine to get into this issue. I figured someone would step up, but I haven’t seen that happen at all. There’s clearly a big problem with certain sects of the Jewish community in how they are treating their tenants. It’s a national problem. It’s a New York City problem, and it’s a Jewish problem. I am currently deliberating the best approach to take this on.

Boycott Judaism, Shmuly. That will show us. Convert and become a Methodist. Then you’ll be their problem.

It’s always a concern of mine that ultra-Orthodox Jews are going to get scapegoated. So I think it’s up to us to clean it up, and not for outsiders to point fingers at Jews. . . .

So Shmuly fights scapegoating by appearing in an outside newspaper’s scapegoating piece that targets one group for a specific type of crime. That makes so much sense it hurts.

On to Jill Jacobs

Judaism has a lot of things to say about how to create a just society. There are a lot of people who are outwardly religious but ignore a whole section of the Jewish tradition.

Like keeping the Sabbath, not eating pork, no same sex nookie… she can find all that in her own synagogue.

I’m interested in what my community does. And I want my community, which is a Jewish community, to be exemplary.

It’s not your community. Go away.

And as long as there is one Jewish slumlord, then there’s reason for me to raise a public discussion. Any criticism of the Jewish community that comes from the outside is going to be perceived as anti-Semitic.

But if we have Jewish figureheads doing it, then suddenly bigotry is Kosher. Like when black people tell fried chicken jokes on a white owned network.

Sometimes it’s a fair characterization, and sometimes it isn’t. Some people will say, “But this is a stereotype! There are so many other slumlords that aren’t Jewish.” But my attitude is if this is my community, and I am a leader in my community, then I want it to follow Jewish values and laws.

Then maybe Jill Jacobs should start with her community, instead of talking about other communities she has no connection to anyway, in a newspaper that’s hostile to those communities.

Fuck this shit. I don’t have the stomach to read through more of it. It’s a disgusting minstrel show and I have trouble believing that I’m reading this in 2010 and not 1910. It’s arrogant, condescending bigotry at its worst.

I’m looking forward to that piece the Village Voice isn’t going to do on Imam Rauf and how he can justify being a slumlord and an Imam.

Jeffrey Goldberg is a wealthy writer. That he has no other way to make money except by writing trolling pieces over at The Atlantic and making up interviews with Fidel Castro, is not our fault. It’s due to his own negligence. At some point the people who work for a living are going to have to tell Jeffrey Goldberg that if he wants to earn a living, he has to develop some basic useful skills, such as carpentry or plumbing.

We’ve had enough of subsidizing Jeffrey Goldberg and we’re not doing him any favors by letting him think that he can live high on the hog with no other skills but his Atlantic trolling stories. There are a great many causes that deserve money, like the homeless and the endangered squirrels and the homeless endangered squirrels. But Jeffrey Goldberg should not expect to have his lifestyle subsidized by the people of Boca Raton, Potomac and the Upper West Side.

My sympathy is with Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrew Sullivan and the rest of the human jokes masquerading as writers at The Atlantic who might have to cut back on their cocktails and their rented ponies, but not with their poor money management skills that lead them to think that trolling the internet is a career. It is not a career. And it’s time they learned that. That’s why I’m not going to contribute to funding their poor life choices and lifestyles.

1. Judge Andrew Napolitano on Arizona’s Immigration Law

She’s gonna bankrupt the Republican Party and the state of Arizona. She’s also gonna bankrupt her state, because no insurance company will provide coverage for this.

2. Judge Andrew Napolitano on Bush and Cheney

They should have been indicted. They absolutely should have been indicted, for torturing, for spying, for arresting without warrant.

3. Judge Andrew Napolitano on why he thinks we fought the Cold War

“We fought a cold war against countries in eastern Europe that thought they had the power to stop people on the basis of the way they looked and demand to see their papers.”

4. Judge Andrew Napolitano on 9/11

“People will look at 9-11 the way we look at the assassination of JFK today. It couldn’t possibly have been done the way the government told us.”

5. Judge Andrew Napolitano channels Lenin

“The revolution, which we are in the early stages of, will first cause our empire to crumble. I mean, we simply will not be able to finance over 900 permanent military installations all around the globe. And those people will be free from our occupation. Now, the second stage of the revolution, in his view and in mine, is sort of like what happened the Soviet Union fell. When the Soviet Union fell, the countries that it had occupied from before, during, and after World War II became free countries.”

6. Judge Andrew Napolitano on Israel and Terrorism

“Some people theorize that Israel’s extreme tactics have provoked more extreme responses from the terrorists. Hence the Israel-terrorist cycle continues.”

7. Judge Andrew Napolitano on Nazi Saboteurs during WW2

“The Court persisted in its abominable disregard for civil rights when it faced a small band of Germans and German-Americans charged with treason.”

8. Judge Andrew Napolitano on the Chicago murderers of a police officer

“They were courage personified, men with the hearts of wolves.”

9. Judge Andrew Napolitano on terrorist collaborator Lynn Stewart

“The conviction of Lynne F. Stewart for providing material aid to terrorism and for lying to the government is another perverse victory in the Justice Department’s assault on the Constitution.”

10. Judge Andrew Napolitano is outraged by Americans preying on Muslim terrorists

“Rossmiller came across a posting on bravemuslim.com by a man calling himself “Amir Abdul Rashid” who was “edging toward violence”. Rossmiller posed as an Algerian with ties to a militant Islamic group and send Rashid an email entitled A Call to Jihad. Rashid responded by asking whether a “brother fighting on the wrong side could defect”. After she exchanged twenty-seven emails with Rashid, she learned that Rashid was really a US National Guardsman about to be deployed in Iraq. She reported Rashid to the government since he appeared to be willing to share information on American troop vulnerabilities with the enemy.

Rossmiller preyed on an individual who was innocent. After he was convicted by a court martial, he was sentenced to life in prison. The crime was attempted treason. Who did he harm?

Judge Andrew Napolitano. Constitutional scholar. Who doesn’t know when to use “who” or “whom”. But he knows everything else. Like how Bush is Hitler and Cheney is Supa-Hitler and the Nazis, Anarchists, Communists and Terrorists are victims of our occupation. And when we withdraw from our occupation of countries like Germany and Japan, they’ll finally be free.

Lord have mercy.